![]() | |
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Mitel Ask Questions and Find Answers on Mitel Systems: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Junior Member
Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Tranf/Conf - call rerouting Hi, I have a SX2000 and im using the SS4025 First Assistant: 3201 - Type: key system Second Assistant: 3203 - Type: single line Boss: 3202 - Type: key system Everytime that the Second assistant is trying to transfer the call to the BOSS it goes to the First assistant phone instead of the BOSS. Here is what i have in place On the BOSS phone no one is able to call him because in the call rerouting form i have ALWAYS Alternative for DID, TIE, CO, INTERNAL and it routes the call to the FIRST assistant extension(3201) If the First assistant does not pick up than it will transfer the second assistant extension (3203) because in the first altervnative form i have set DID,TIE,CO, Internal with THIS and it routes to the second assistant extention( 3203) My question is everytime that the second assistant tries to tranfer the call to the BOSS(3202) it goes to the first assistant extention(3201) . How would the second assistant be able to transfer the call to the BOSS directly? The first assistnat is able to transfer the call to the BOSS without any problems. Im also looking into the mutline set group form and multiline set key assisngment but im getting confused thank you | ||||||||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Moderator ![]() ![]() acejavelin is a high-tech, heavy metal redneck!
Location: North Dakota Rep Power: 2 ![]() | The first assistant can transfer to the boss because a call can't redirect to itself, the second assistant will never be able to transfer to the boss the way it is setup. This can be done in two ways, one is using secretarial keys for the bosses extension on the two assistants, then CF the bosses extension to phantom multicall appearance on the two assistants phones, I have never done this, but it should work. The other way would be to switch the bosses extension to a keyline appearance on the two assistants phones, then give the boss a different extension that no one knows. __________________ Telephony users cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain a useful feature, a feature of equal value must be lost. This is Telephony’s First Law of Equivalent Exchange. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |||||||||
| Junior Member ![]()
Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Quote:
| |||||||||
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |||||||||
| Moderator ![]() ![]() acejavelin is a high-tech, heavy metal redneck!
Location: North Dakota Rep Power: 2 ![]() | Quote:
My main issue was with the call rerouting... it made a full circle and since Asst 2 is not the call reroute destination of the boss (Asst 1 is) then all calls by asst 2 to the boss will be rerouted to asst 1. My point was that using Call Rerouting in this way will not work. __________________ Telephony users cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain a useful feature, a feature of equal value must be lost. This is Telephony’s First Law of Equivalent Exchange. | |||||||||
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Conf call settings for type 500 | Brian0360 | Meridian Systems | 1 | February 26th, 2007 02:56 PM |
| Wrong CLID showning up in call from Conf Bridge | Raices | Meridian Systems | 2 | December 13th, 2006 01:32 PM |
| Improving quality of a 4/8/16/32 party conf on a Conf Trunk Card... | dmad | NEAX 2000 IVS(2)/ IPS | 6 | September 1st, 2006 10:52 AM |
| conf call not disconnecting | deepburst | Meridian Systems | 1 | July 24th, 2006 08:59 AM |
| Possible to disconnect one specific party on a Conf. Call? | jsak | Meridian Systems | 7 | April 23rd, 2004 12:02 PM |