| |||||||||
![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Meridian Systems Welcome to the Nortel Meridian Forums Including Meridian Options 11-81C CS1000M Meridian Mail Call Pilot Companion and Sucession Hospitality OTM MAT MICB RAN NetGateway ..., and all other Applications |
| Tags: across, groups, network, splitting, superloop |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Junior Member ![]() hhallett has no status.
Location: In an almost perpetual mental fog! Rep Power: 6 ![]() | 2 questions about splitting a superloop: 1. Is it possible to split a superloop and place the loops in seperate Network Groups (say, for example, taking card slots 12-15 from loop 24 shelf 1 and making them loop 36 shelf 1)? 2. If so, how do I do this without causing myself other problems? I'm looking at this as a way to add a music trunk to Network Group 2 (where all of the incoming T-1s are presently programmed) in an Opt 81C. My employer has an unbalanced system and we need to address that, but they want MOH for the incoming trunks ASAP. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |||||||||
| Junior Member ![]() hhallett has no status.
Location: In an almost perpetual mental fog! Rep Power: 6 ![]() | Quote:
I want to be able to add a universal trunk card to network group 2, but to do so I need a PE shelf in Group 2. That's why I'm hoping I can do it by splitting a superloop in the way I described. I just need to know if this can actually be done and, if so, how to do it without giving myself more headaches. | |||||||||
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member ![]() gei_spot is going phishing
Location: Somewhere in this vast universe on a little rock that looks like a grape. Rep Power: 11 ![]() | You will not be able to do that, because of the way the cables (switch tails) are config'd. Unless someone eles has done this B4, I'd say that you may be putting in some OT to balance the switch. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |||||||||
| Senior Member ![]() slagburn has no status.
Location: 3498.51 miles from Tiverton, Ontario (CANADA) Rep Power: 16 ![]() | What is tracking???? I think the title of this thread is throwing people off, it should say 'Splitting an IPE shelf across Network Groups' since the shelf is splitting and not the superloop. Quote:
To the original questions... 1) I've been told no by more than one person however I can't find any documentation in engineering manuals to support this. I would think that if it were a problem it would be documented somewhere in the IPE segmentation documents but if it is I couldn't find it. This morning I was able to split a controller between network groups in software without any hang ups however I didn't have enough cables to fully test it. SUPL SUPT SLOT XPEC0 XPEC1 008 STD LEFT 01 0 1 -- - - 056 STD LEFT 01 2 3 -- - - 2) I don't really know the right way to do it since the last one I took part in ended up getting corrupted from the several 1000 sets we moved. (Not my idea) Some things to consider are if you are using a telemanagment system that relies heavily on TN information to assign a BAC i.e. Avotus. When we manually moved the stations to new TNs the BACs never updated and we lost a lot of billing info while someone had to manually modify the BAC database. I'm not familiar with any of the other management systems but I do know that it's important to keep that aspect in mind. If I had to do it again I would let the telemanagement folks do an order to out the sets and rebuild them back on the new TNs. | |||||||||
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member ![]() gei_spot is going phishing
Location: Somewhere in this vast universe on a little rock that looks like a grape. Rep Power: 11 ![]() | RE: [quote="slagburn"] I think the title of this thread is throwing people off, it should say 'Splitting an IPE shelf across Network Groups' since the shelf is splitting and not the superloop. Good catch Slag... really didn't read the original post. Have been having some issuse at the office and haven't had time to dig into the forum yet 2) I don't really know the right way to do it since the last one I took part in ended up getting corrupted from the several 1000 sets we moved. (Not my idea) Some things to consider are if you are using a telemanagment system that relies heavily on TN information to assign a BAC i.e. Avotus. When we manually moved the stations to new TNs the BACs never updated and we lost a lot of billing info while someone had to manually modify the BAC database. I'm not familiar with any of the other management systems but I do know that it's important to keep that aspect in mind. If I had to do it again I would let the telemanagement folks do an order to out the sets and rebuild them back on the new TNs. Sorry you had to go through this.. sounds like it was the making of a [b]BAAAD week | ||||||||
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member ![]() slagburn has no status.
Location: 3498.51 miles from Tiverton, Ontario (CANADA) Rep Power: 16 ![]() | lol NMP... Not My Problem. The two senior techs who moved the 1000+ phones got to deal with the fall out. I was just the cable swinger jumper guy... of course those two techs both told me on numerous occasions not to move a lot of sets at once before this happend. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Junior Member
Location: Keflavik Iceland Rep Power: 0 ![]() | Call Forward Button Well if that is your problem then look at this. Music Broadcast feature expands existing Music functionality. This feature provides the following enhancements: • Broadcast Capabilities • Incremental Software Management limit • Traffic Study Option Broadcast Capabilities Existing Conference-based Music features require that each Music trunk be assigned to a Music route and to a Conference loop. Incoming callers are bridged into a listen-only conference and provided with music while on call hold or call waiting in an Automatic Call Distribution (ACD) environment. The existing Conference-based Music features support intra-group music only. Therefore, each network group must be provided with its own Music trunk. The Music Broadcast feature allows the Meridian 1 system to broadcast music to several parties at one time via a single Music Broadcast trunk port. This feature supports Music on Hold (MOH). Music is now delivered via X11 software; hence, Conference hardware is not required. It is no longer necessary to share Conference resources with Conference features, such as Conference and Group Call. Music Broadcast supports both intra-group and inter-group music. Therefore, a Music trunk in each network group is not required. Feature packaging Music Broadcast (MUSBRD) is package 328. The following packages are also required to provide Music Broadcast capability: • Music (MUS) package 44 • Recorded Announcement (RAN) package 7 To provide Music Broadcast capability to Enhanced Music (EMUS) features, the Enhanced Music (EMUS) package 119 is also required. Feature implementation Task summary list The following is a summary of the tasks in this section: 1 LD 16 – Change an existing non-broadcasting Music route to a broadcasting Music route. 2 LD 16 – Enable Conference-based Music route. 3 LD 14 – Configure Conference-based Music trunks. It is a lenghtly answer but I did not type it all "cut&past " is my method when I can. I know this may not help because you might be missing packages but if you got them this is by far the easies way of fixing your problem. :wink: | ||||||||
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Junior Member ![]()
Location: NE Rep Power: 6 ![]() | slagburn, I have all the packages required for MusBrd, I have 20 conn not in use. I have one music route and are currently using enhanced music I would like to turn on MusBrd. I thought I understood the NTP to say that for every music conn I can broadcast to 64 callers at a time. So, with 20 conn I should be able to broadcast to 1280 callers at the same time, right? Or is it in relation to the # of conn I have, being 20 I can bradcast to 20 callers? I have recieved different answeres on the subjuct and hope you can clarify for me. Sorry I'm sure it is not an easy question. Clear as mud.... | ||||||||
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| IP Telephony;what you might want to know before buying Cisco | Anonymous | VOIP Talk | 10 | 04-22-2006 09:26 AM |
| HELP..NAM...Minuet ACD...Can't assign agents to groups....!! | hotextec | BCM and Norstar | 4 | 12-05-2003 03:43 AM |
| Unable to use a Symposium Client when VPN'd into network | fonchick | Meridian Systems | 4 | 10-31-2003 08:59 AM |
| Trunk to Trunk connection woes... | Hi-Tech | Meridian Systems | 2 | 02-05-2003 07:25 PM |
| Call Pilot - Changing from standalone to the company network | Hi-Tech | Meridian Systems | 3 | 11-19-2002 10:37 AM |