| |||||||||
![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Meridian Systems Welcome to the Nortel Meridian Forums Including Meridian Options 11-81C CS1000M Meridian Mail Call Pilot Companion and Sucession Hospitality OTM MAT MICB RAN NetGateway ..., and all other Applications |
| Tags: 2000, documentationlegal, levels, phones, regarding, series, speak |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member
Location: Lou, KY Rep Power: 9 ![]() | Need Documentation/legal speak regarding dB levels of 2000 series phones Again, this issue is creeping up. I have a call center using 2216 sets. The docs that I have show that the set is HAC compliant and increases the dB level to 13.5 dB above nominal. They want a definition of nominal. I know that human hearing ranges from 0 to 130 (pain threshold). I am not a doctor or a lawyer. Are there any specs that are dated recently, that someone could send me that would assist? They claim that they can't hear, can't be heard. This issue can't be duplicated and is only occuring with a select few employees. I am looking for OSHA, HAC, TIA, something that would put this issue to rest. I need good strong resources. Anyone have a clue? Google has not been a wealth of help on this topic. rlc __________________ No matter where you go, there is the Ladies Love Marty Fan Club. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member
Rep Power: 4 ![]() | I know from charts that I've looked at the "Normal Conversation" is approx 60db I know the docs say the 2216 is HAC compliant, but are the headsets/handsets the most current? or did they get swapped with older versions maybe? Just trying to hit on something that might help.... Here's some dry reading for you: (Chart) Figure 3: Decibel levels of common sounds. 60 dB Everyday conversation, ringing telephone. 70 dB Restaurant. 80 dB Heavy city traffic, alarm clock at 2 feet, factory noise, vacuum cleaner, garbage disposal. 90 dB Subway trains, motorcycle, workshop tools, lawn mower. 100 dB Chain saw, pneumatic drill. 110 dB Dance club. 120 dB Rock concert speaker sound, sandblasting, thunderclap. 130 dB Jet take off, gunfire. Note : The actual (ROLR) Receive Objective Loudness Rating is a measument reference that I cannot find right at the moment - the following speaks to it: [Code of Federal Regulations] [Title 47, Volume 3] [Revised as of October 1, 2004] From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 47CFR68.317] [Page 386-387] TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED) PART 68_CONNECTION OF TERMINAL EQUIPMENT TO THE TELEPHONE NETWORK--Table of Contents Subpart D_Conditions for Terminal Equipment Approval Sec. 68.317 Hearing aid compatibility volume control: technical standards. (a) An analog telephone complies with the Commission's volume control requirements if the telephone is equipped with a receive volume control that provides, through the receiver in the handset or headset of the telephone, 12 dB of gain minimum and up to 18 dB of gain maximum, when measured in terms of Receive Objective Loudness Rating (ROLR), as defined in paragraph 4.1.2 of ANSI/EIA-470-A-1987 (Telephone Instruments With Loop Signaling) . The 12 dB of gain minimum must be achieved without significant clipping of the test signal. The telephone also shall comply with the upper and lower limits for ROLR given in table 4.4 of ANSI/EIA-470-A-1987 when the receive volume control is set to its normal unamplified level. Note to paragraph(a): Paragraph 4.1.2 of ANSI/EIA-470-A-1987 identifies several characteristics related to the receive response of a telephone. It is only the normal unamplified ROLR level and the change in ROLR as a function of the volume control setting that are relevant to the specification of volume control as required by this section. (b) The ROLR of an analog telephone shall be determined over the frequency range from 300 to 3300 HZ for short, average, and long loop conditions represented by 0, 2.7, and 4.6 km of 26 AWG nonloaded cable, respectively. The specified length of cable will be simulated by a complex impedance. (See Figure A.) The input level to the cable simulator shall be -10 dB with respect to 1 V open circuit from a 900 ohm source. (c) A digital telephone complies with the Commission's volume control requirements if the telephone is equipped with a receive volume control that provides, through the receiver of the handset or headset of the telephone, 12 dB of gain minimum and up to 18 dB of gain maximum, when measured in terms of Receive Objective Loudness Rating (ROLR), as defined in paragraph 4.3.2 of ANSI/EIA/TIA-579-1991 (Acoustic-To-Digital and Digital-To-Acoustic Transmission Requirements for ISDN Terminals). The 12 dB of gain minimum must be achieved without significant clipping of the test signal. The telephone also shall comply with the limits on the range for ROLR given in paragraph 4.3.2.2 of ANSI/EIA/TIA-579-1991 when the receive volume control is set to its normal unamplified level. (d) The ROLR of a digital telephone shall be determined over the frequency range from 300 to 3300 Hz using the method described in paragraph 4.3.2.1 of ANSI/EIA/TIA-579-1991. No variation in loop conditions is required for this measurement since the receive level of a digital telephone is independent of loop length. (e) The ROLR for either an analog or digital telephone shall first be determined with the receive volume control at its normal unamplified level. The minimum volume control setting shall be used for this measurement unless the manufacturer identifies a different setting for the nominal volume level. The ROLR shall then be determined with the receive volume control at its maximum volume setting. Since ROLR is a loudness rating value expressed in dB of loss, more positive values of ROLR represent lower receive levels. Therefore, the ROLR value determined for the maximum volume control setting should be subtracted from that determined for the nominal volume control setting to determine compliance with the gain requirement. (f) The 18 dB of receive gain may be exceeded provided that the amplified receive capability automatically resets to nominal gain when the telephone is [[Page 387]] caused to pass through a proper on-hook transition in order to minimize the likelihood of damage to individuals with normal hearing. (g) These incorporations by reference of paragraph 4.1.2 (including table 4.4) of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard ANSI/EIA-470-A-1987 and paragraph 4.3.2 of ANSI/EIA/TIA-579-1991 were approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of these publications may be purchased from the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Sales Department, 11 West 42nd Street, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10036, (212) 642-4900. Copies also may be inspected during normal business hours at the following locations: Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554; and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, [61 FR 42187, Aug. 14, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 60726, Nov. 8, 1999; 67 FR 13229, Mar. 21, 2002; 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004] | ||||||||
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member
Location: MIAMI, FLA Rep Power: 7 ![]() | I Would Suggest If The Higher Ups Want A Difinition, They Can Understand That You Contact Your Vendor. Actually It Sounding Like This Is Already In A Legal Thing, I Would Have The Lawyers Contact Nortel Direct Through Your Vendor | ||||||||
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Senior Member
Location: Lou, KY Rep Power: 9 ![]() | Thanks for the good stuff. I have recommended that Nortel be contacted. This is beyond my office or my scope. I can find no physical cause or proof of the issues being reported. I can't duplicate. When on site, I jacked in to the calls when they said they were having a problem and the problem was the other person was on a cordless phone and outside or on a cell phone. I experienced not a single case of the telephony equipment failing or lacking. I don't know what more I can do. rlc __________________ No matter where you go, there is the Ladies Love Marty Fan Club. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | ||||||||
| Junior Member
Location: East Coast Rep Power: 6 ![]() | Because the phone cant speak for itself (or can it?), it is obviously an easy target for blame. In my case, what I did was.. take all of the people complaining. Move them to a quiet area of the building (in my case, it was an underground vault) with no AC or heat.Remove all radios. No cordoroy pants (removes all 'thick-thighed' noises). Board up all windows and close the blinds. Remove all articles of clothing that could interfere with being able to listen to phone (no earrings). Have all users clean out there ears with Q-Tips at the beginning of each shift (mandatory)...and above all, tell everyone to STHU when someone else is on the phone. TGIF! Good Luck. | ||||||||
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |||||||||
| Junior Member
Location: Melbourne Australia Rep Power: 5 ![]() | Quote:
cat | |||||||||
| | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |