Home         |        Forums         |        Portals          |           Login               |     Register              
 
Go Back   VoIP / PBX Info Forum for Avaya / Nortel, Cisco, ShoreTel, Panasonic and other manufactuers Tech Tips Community > PBX / IP PBX FORUMS > NORTEL > BCM and Norstar
Reload this Page Destination codes/received digits conflict
   SEARCH  
     
User Name Password      
Save ?
BCM and Norstar ICS, CICS, MICS, BCM, BCM 50 BCM 200 and BCM 400, Startalk Voicemail call pilot 150

Nortel BCM Console, Switch Administration, Call Accounting, Hotel Billing, SMDR, ACD Reporting

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 15th, 2008   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member

Activity Longevity
0/20 10/20
Today Posts
0/0 ssssss101
Rep Power: 0topp is a newbie
Country:
Destination codes/received digits conflict
Migrating a set of analog numbers over to a PRI on a new system with a majority of the 4 digit received digits being 9000 numbers. My question is that it appears to have a conflict when I try to create destination codes that begin with 9. The way it looks is the system will not allow the destination codes and received digits be the same. Does anyone know anyway around this? Right now I am looking at changing it from the phone company sending me 7 not 4 digits which should resolve the problem didn't know if anyone had explanation for this or a go around.

On another note how does this affect my 4 digit dialing over IP? I believe my private network will remain at 4 digit but haven't played with it completely any help would help.
topp is offline   sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #2 (permalink)
Junior Member
 
gogoGophers's Avatar
gogoGophers is looking for a large bag of money in the road

Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/0 ssssss660
Location: Meechigan
Rep Power: 7gogoGophers is on a distinguished road
Gender:
Country:
Continue to pursue the 7 digits from CO thing. There is no workaround. The numbering system will not allow you to have 9xxx DN's and 9 destination codes. Private DN length should be OK.
gogoGophers is offline   sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Old April 15th, 2008   #3 (permalink)
Junior Member

Activity Longevity
0/20 10/20
Today Posts
0/0 ssssss101
Rep Power: 0topp is a newbie
Country:
That is what I thought on the Private DN length I can still handle my routes and pools just as I did in the past I don't have to designate the IP trunks as private trunks or something like that?
topp is offline   sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
received limit on pri for digits HCJes Meridian Systems 1 January 16th, 2006 04:42 PM
Destination Codes Issue Shooter BCM and Norstar 16 October 4th, 2005 12:27 PM
report conflict waleezooooo Contact Center Symposium and ACD 10 December 6th, 2004 05:49 AM
CLS conflict...looking for a reason. Pirates_Ghost Meridian Systems 5 December 4th, 2003 11:44 AM
Number of Received digits changing on T1 bobbyb Meridian Systems 1 December 10th, 2002 08:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Contact Us - PBX Info Forum | Telephony Resource Tech Tips Community for Avaya, Nortel, Cisco, Panasonic, ShoreTel, Asterisk and more... - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright (c) www.pbxinfo.com - PBX Info | Free PBX, PABX, IP PBX, VOIP and Telephone Information Resource Forum - Avaya / Nortel, Cisco, Panasonic, Mitel, ShoreTel, more...