Ok...so there apparently is a CLS conflict between DND(D)A and MT(D)A.
If the CLS reflects DNDA but MTD, the the Calling party ID does not appear correctly on the roll over line. (Instead, shows the calling number, but the primary key's name)
To correct I've found either CLS = DNDA and MTA or DNDD and MTD
Just currious to know:
IS there a good reason to utilized DNDA (just ingrained to do that now after many many years and have forgoten it's purpose)
WHY would those too conflict, their purpose in inherently different.
__________________
You can't wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you - Look, if I went 'round saying I was an Emperor, just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!
